Logo image
Validity and reliability of a new clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Validity and reliability of a new clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity

Aileen Eugenia Scully, Dawn May Leng Tan, Beatriz IR de Oliveira, Keith David Hill, Ross Clark and Yong Hao Pua
Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol.46(14), pp.3133-3140
2024
PMID: 37551868
pdf
Validity and reliability of a new clinician rated tool for freezing of gait severity1.89 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2242257View
Published Version

Abstract

Parkinson's disease freezing of gait assessment clinician-rated tool
Purpose: The Freezing of Gait Severity Tool (FOG Tool) was developed because of limitations in existing assessments. This cross-sectional study investigated its validity and reliability. Methods: People with Parkinson’s disease (PD) were recruited consecutively from clinics. Those who could not walk eight-metres independently (with or without an assistive device), comprehend instructions, or with co-morbidities affecting walking were excluded. Participants completed a set of assessments including the FOG Tool, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Freezing of Gait Questionnaire. The FOG Tool was repeated and those reporting no medication state change evaluated for test-retest reliability. Validity and reliability were investigated through Spearman’s correlations and ICC (two-way, random). McNemar’s test was applied to compare the FOG Tool and TUG on the proportion of people with freezing. Results: Thirty-nine participants were recruited [79.5%(n = 31) male; Median(IQR): age–73.0(9.0) years; disease duration–4.0(5.8) years]. Fifteen (38.5%) contributed to test-retest reliability analyses. The FOG Tool demonstrated strongest associations with the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (ρ = 0.67, 95%CI 0.43–0.83). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.96, 95%CI 0.88–0.99). The FOG Tool had 6.2 times the odds (95%CI 2.4–20.4, p < 0.001) of triggering freezing compared to the TUG. Conclusions: The FOG Tool appeared adequately valid and reliable in this small sample of people with PD. It was more successful in triggering freezing than the TUG.

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
51 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Rehabilitation

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image