Logo image
Validity and Utility of a Modified Short Physical Performance Battery Assessment and Scoring Approach in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Validity and Utility of a Modified Short Physical Performance Battery Assessment and Scoring Approach in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Yong-Hao Pua, Laura Tay, Sapphire Lin, Si-Qi Lim, Ross Allan Clark, Julian Thumboo, Ee-Ling Tay, Shi-Min Mah, Min-Xian Wang, Sharon Jie-Yi Chew, …
American Medical Directors Association. Journal, Vol.27(2), p.1
2026
PMID: 41386281

Abstract

frailty SPPB mobility net benefit clinical utility sarcopenia
Objectives Despite the widespread usage of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), psychometric limitations in the SPPB have impeded its use for outcome monitoring and clinical decision making. We propose an alternative assessment and scoring approach for the SPPB, and we compared the modified and the original SPPB on their discriminative and clinical value concerning the risk of prefrailty/frailty, probable sarcopenia, and restricted life-space mobility (RLSM). Design Cross-sectional study conducted from June 2018 to August 2023. Setting and Participants A community-dwelling sample of 2331 participants [mean (SD), 66 (7.5) years; 71% women] completed a survey and fitness assessment. Methods SPPB scores, FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight) scores, handgrip strength, and Life-Space Assessment scores were obtained from all participants. SPPB modifications involved (1) increasing the difficulty of the full-tandem balance test and (2) adopting a continuous scoring system. Participants with a FRAIL score ≥1, a weak handgrip strength (<18 kg for women and <28 kg for men), and a Life-Space Assessment <60 points were classified as having prefrailty/frailty, probable sarcopenia, and RLSM, respectively. Discriminative validity was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analyses, whereas clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Results The proposed modifications significantly reduced the ceiling effect of the SPPB (original vs modified SPPB: 70% vs 27%, P < .001) and improved its discriminative validity for prefrailty/frailty, sarcopenia, and RLSM outcomes (AUC increments, 0.03–0.08; P values < .001). In decision curve analyses, these improvements translated to greater net benefit particularly in the 10% to 20% decision risk range. Conclusions and Implications Although requiring further validation in diverse populations and longitudinal studies, the proposed modifications to the SPPB have the potential to widen its scope of use and facilitate more accurate risk stratification and granular outcome monitoring in community-dwelling adults.

Details

Metrics

12 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Geriatrics & Gerontology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image