Logo image
Associations of 2 Established Methods of Measuring Gait Speed and Sit-To-Stand Performance with Frailty and Life-Space Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Associations of 2 Established Methods of Measuring Gait Speed and Sit-To-Stand Performance with Frailty and Life-Space Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Yong-Hao Pua, Laura Tay, Ross Allan Clark, Ee-Lin Woon, Julian Thumboo, Ee-Ling Tay, Shi-Min Mah, Min Xian Wang, Jin Jin Lim and Yee-Sien Ng
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol.25(12), pp.1-8
2024
PMID: 39368802

Abstract

clinical utility Frailty mobility net benefit prognosis
Objectives The 4-m gait speed (4mGS) and 10-m gait speed (10mGS) tests and the 30-second sit-to-stand (30sSTS) and 5-times sit-to-stand (5xSTS) tests are commonly used and advocated in consensus recommendations. We compared these tests on their predictive and clinical value concerning the risk of prefrailty/frailty and restricted life-space mobility (RLSM). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants A sample of 1235 community-dwelling adults (mean ± SD, 68 ± 7 years) participated in this prospective cohort study. Methods At baseline assessment, participants completed a survey and functional assessment, from which gait speed, sit-to-stand performance, self-reported mobility limitation, 40-item Frailty Index, and Life Space Assessment were measured. Participants with a 40-item Frailty Index >0.15 and a Life Space Assessment <60 points were classified as having prefrailty/frailty and RLSM, respectively. At 1-year follow-up assessment, prefrailty/frailty and RLSM were evaluated. Results Correlations between gait speed and sit-to-stand measures were high (ρ values >0.80). In multivariable ordinal models, these measures added incremental prognostic value beyond a base model comprising demographics and self-reported mobility limitation variables in predicting baseline and 1-year outcomes. Between 10mGS and 4mGS, models with 10mGS had higher concordance indices (differences, 0.005-0.009), and these differences translated to generally greater net benefit in decision curve analyses. Between 30sSTS and 5xSTS measures, no one measure consistently outperformed the other, with small net benefit differences between measures (<0.2%). Conclusions and Implications In community-dwelling older adults, gait speed and sit-to-stand measures meaningfully predicted prefrailty/frailty and RLSM. 10mGS provided more robust prognostic information than the 4mGS, whereas 5xSTS and 30sSTS measures showed near equivalence of performance. These findings could guide the choice of functional measures in clinical and research settings.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Geriatrics & Gerontology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image