Logo image
Strength Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study Investigating Overlap of Tests
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Strength Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study Investigating Overlap of Tests

Krisoffer Weisskirchner Barford, Julian A Feller, Ross Clark, Taylor Hartwig, Brian M Devitt and Kate E Webster
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol.33(11), pp.3145-3150
2019
pdf
PDF - Author Accepted Version1.83 MBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002491View
Published Version

Abstract

redundancy overlap ACL test protocol
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether overlap (redundancy) exists between individual tests in a comprehensive strength testing protocol used after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. If overlap is present, one or more components of the protocol could potentially be omitted to make the testing protocol more efficient, but without compromising the usefulness of the testing. Sixty-nine patients (46M, 23F; mean age 28Y) were strength tested at 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction as part of a prospective cohort study. The following knee flexor and extensor strength tests were performed: isokinetic concentric strength at 60°/s and 180°/s, isokinetic eccentric strength at 60°/s, and isometric knee flexor strength at 60° flexion. Peak and average torque values were extracted and the ratio between the operated and non-operated limb calculated as a limb symmetry index. Overlap of strength tests was investigated by fitting a linear regression model to the data with an R2 threshold of 0.56 used as an indication of overlap. Overlap between peak and mean torque was present for extensor and flexor concentric and eccentric measurements at 12 months and for concentric measurements at 6 months. Peak torque measurements were therefore used for subsequent analysis. Concentric extensor peak torque at 60°/s and 180°/s showed overlap at 6 months (R2 = 0.73) but not at 12 months (R2 = 0.37). No other overlap was identified. In conclusion, there is little room for omission of individual strength testing protocol components due to the lack of overlap between tests. Isometric, eccentric and concentric tests may all provide unique information and all therefore should be considered for inclusion.

Details

Metrics

27 File views/ downloads
394 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
Logo image