Logo image
Family Relationship Rupture, Coercive Dynamics, and Suicide Risk: Expanding the Evidence Base for the DFSV-Suicide Enquiry - Supplementary Submission (Corrigendum) to Submission 134 to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs
Report   Open access

Family Relationship Rupture, Coercive Dynamics, and Suicide Risk: Expanding the Evidence Base for the DFSV-Suicide Enquiry - Supplementary Submission (Corrigendum) to Submission 134 to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs

Stan Korosi
University of the Sunshine Coast
2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25907/01031
pdf
20260324_SK_Standing Committee_DFSV_Suicide_Supplementary Submission_Final_Text_V4285.82 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/DFSVSuicidedataView
Webpage

Abstract

Public health Family law Families and family services Public services policy advice and analysis parental alienation family law family violence public health

This submission argues that current Australian suicide prevention and domestic, family and sexual violence (DFSV) policy settings are not yet sufficiently specified to explain, or prevent, a substantial subset of suicide deaths associated with family relationship rupture during separation and divorce (the psychosocial category ICD-10 Z63.5). The dominant DFSV victim–perpetrator framing captures important forms of harm, but on its own may under-specify coercive relational dynamics, social causation, and institutional responses that can intensify suicidality in both women and men.

The submission identifies a significant policy blind spot in national suicide data. In 2023, there was a ratio of approximately 3:1 male-to-female overall suicide mortality, and approximately 4:1 in this category (Z63.5). In absolute terms, almost one man every day and nearly one woman every four to five days dies from suicide in this category. This prevalence pattern warrants a more targeted prevention response than generic “relationship problems” framing.

A central proposition is that parental alienating behaviours (PABs) and related parental alienation presentations should be examined as one under-recognised form of coercive relational and parenting dynamics affecting both men and women within family relationship rupture. The claim is not that all cases are alienation, but that some coercive pathways may be insufficiently recognised in current suicide prevention settings.

The submission argues that Australia’s National Suicide Prevention Strategy recognises family relationship disruption as a suicide factor but does not yet provide a sufficiently targeted response for this high-risk presentation. It recommends a practical policy package: targeted evidence review, improved data and case-review capability, gender-inclusive risk identification, pathway-specific interventions, specialist service commissioning and evaluation, evidentiary safeguards, and practitioner training.

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
11 Record Views
Logo image