Preprint
Evaluating a Strategic Approach for Selecting and Ranking Holistic Measures of Conservation Success
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) , Vol.30 March 2024
Elsevier
2024
Abstract
Evidence-based conservation often fails to balance biological and socioeconomic measures of success. Selection of indicators is often biased by expert opinion, misaligned with conservation goals, and lacks scientific rigor. In this study, we develop and test a new approach for selecting conservation indicators, designed for monitoring any conservation project worldwide. This Holistic Indicator Selection Protocol (HISP), uses a semi-systematic approach based around the widely-adopted Conservation Standards, balancing biological, socioeconomic and governance considerations to identify context-specific indicators of success. For a case study landscape with globally typical conservation challenges, we employ four indices prioritising: 1–conservation threats; 2–project conceptual model parameters; 3–expert opinion; and 4–equitable stakeholder opinion. We used statistical approaches to evaluate the applicability of each index for representing the four priorities, and for minimizing biases and complexity. The indicators effectively represented biological and socioeconomic considerations, direct and indirect threats, key ecological targets, and the success of governing strategies. Over half of the indicators ranked in the top 50% across all indices, thus underscoring a priority set of indicators. The threat-based index prioritised socioeconomic challenges, whereas the model-based index balanced socioeconomic and biological indicators, suggesting more broad applicability. The two opinion-based indices introduced some biases, but their similarity to the more systematic indices showed their value for resource-limited settings. The study has revealed a relatively unbiased approach for selecting, balancing and prioritising conservation indicators, aligning strategic planning with local knowledge, and thus advancing evidence-based conservation and bridging the science-implementation gap.
Details
- Title
- Evaluating a Strategic Approach for Selecting and Ranking Holistic Measures of Conservation Success
- Authors
- Andrew Marshall - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Tropical Forests and People Research CentreRodrigo Minici de Oliveira - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Science, Technology and EngineeringRicardo J R Lemos de Figueiredo - University of YorkJohn Meadows - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Forest Research InstituteFrederick Sutton - University of YorkHayley Blackwell - University of YorkJennifer Archer - University of YorkCharles MeshackFadhili M NjilimaSusannah Mary Sallu - University of Leeds
- Publication details
- Social Science Research Network (SSRN) , Vol.30 March 2024
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Date published
- 2024
- DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.4779122
- ISSN
- 1556-5068
- Organisation Unit
- Tropical Forests and People Research Centre; School of Science, Technology and Engineering; Forest Research Institute
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 991020698502621
- Output Type
- Preprint
Metrics
53 File views/ downloads
71 Record Views