Files and links (1)
Preprint VersionCC BY V4.0, Open Access
Preprint
Comparison of Non-Destructive Tools for Measuring MOE of Southern Pine Trees
Research Square, Vol.8 August 2025
Research Square Company
2025
Abstract
Various non-destructive technologies have been employed to assess log quality, facilitating informed decision regarding sorting, segregation and processing decisions. However, there is a lack of comprehensive comparative evaluations of non-destructive tools for MOE assessment in standing trees, speci cally regarding their accuracy, e ciency, practical advantages, and their correlation with the quality of sawn boards. Therefore, this study rst investigated the correlations between log MOE, log density, and average MOE and MOR of boards obtained from each log. Then, the study evaluated the predictive performance of estimating measured log MOE (Measured_MOE) and average board MOE using a destructive (HM200_MOE), a lab-based non-destructive (USMOE), and two eld-deployable nondestructive (ST300_MOE and Resi_MOE) log MOE measurement tools. Finally, a comparison between the destructive and non-destructive tools for log stiffness measurement, focusing on deployability, e ciency, and prediction power was presented. The results showed that as tools become less destructive, their predictive power in estimating log MOE decreases. The destructive method, HM200_MOE, was the most precise (with an 0.78), in estimating log MOE due to its direct measurement on felled logs, followed by the non-destructive m
R^2 = ethods: USMOE (R^2 =0.67), ST300_MOE (R^2 =0.61 explained the highest variability in the average board MOE (R^2), and Resi_MOE (=0.71 R^2 =0.57). USMOE), followed by HM200_MOE (R^2 =0.69), ST300_MOE (R^2 =0.64), and Resi_MOE (R^2 =0.43). Green log density showed very weak correlation with log MOE and average board MOE. In contrast, resin extracted log density had moderate to strong correlations with log MOE (R^2 average board MOE (R^2 = 0.84). from 0.39 to 0.63) and a high positive correlation with average board MOE (R^2 = 0.84).
Destructive methods like HM200 are very precise but costly and unsuitable for eld applications. Labbased non-destructive tools such as USMOE can achieve a balance between precision and accuracy and potential eld applicability but are slower, more expensive, and not eld-deployable like Resi_MOE and ST300_MOE. Field-deployable tools, such as ST300 and Resi, offer practical solutions for operational forestry due to their e ciency and portability. However, their reduced predictive performance underscores the need for improved precision and accuracy through improved modelling or calibration. These ndings highlight the trade-offs between predictive performance and operational e ciency, with the choice of tools depending on the required predictive performance, eld deployability, sampling needs, and the cost of equipment and measurements.
Details
- Title
- Comparison of Non-Destructive Tools for Measuring MOE of Southern Pine Trees
- Authors
- Chandan Kumar (Corresponding Author) - Department of Primary IndustriesHenri Bailleres (Author) - ScionVilius Gendvilas - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Forest Industries Research CentreIan Last (Author) - HQPlantationsDominic P. Kain (Author) - HQPlantationsGeoffrey M Downes (Author) - Forest Quality Pty LtdDavid Lee (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Forest Industries Research Centre
- Publication details
- Research Square, Vol.8 August 2025
- Publisher
- Research Square Company
- Date published
- 2025
- DOI
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7050599/v1
- ISSN
- 2693-5015
- Copyright note
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Grants
- Improving returns from Southern Pine plantations through innovative resource characterisation, 0980022901, Forest and Wood Products (Australia, Melbourne) - FWPAAssessing and managing mid-rotation wood quality in Australian softwood plantations to produce fit-for-purpose logs., PNB548-2021, Forest and Wood Products (Australia, Melbourne) - FWPA
- Organisation Unit
- Forest Industries Research Centre
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 991159240102621
- Output Type
- Preprint
Metrics
11 Record Views