Logo image
Improving comparisons between models for CPUE
Letter/Communication

Improving comparisons between models for CPUE

Peter K Dunn
Fisheries Research, Vol.97(1-2), pp.148-149
2009
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2008.12.017View
Published Version

Abstract

CPUE (catch per unit effort) fisheries Poisson
In a recent article published in this journal, Shono (2008) discuss an issue of great relevance in fisheries: how to model catch per unit effort (CPUE). CPUE data are non-negative and severely skewed right, suggesting gamma or log-Normal models. However, often no fish are caught, which produces exact zeros in the data and neither a gamma or log-Normal model can then be used. These exact zeros cannot be ignored and contain important information. For modelling this type of CPUE data, Shono compares three different approaches commonly used in the literature with the relatively new approach of using a Tweedie generalized linear model (GLM). The four models compared all lie in the GLM methodology (McCullagh and Nelder, 1989): (i) model CPUE using an 'ad hoc' method in which the logarithm of CPUE is modelled using standard linear regression after first adding an (arbitrary) small constant to all CPUE values; (ii) model catch using a Poisson or negative binomial GLM; (iii) model CPUE using a two-step model, where a binomial (logit) GLM is first used to estimate the zero-catch, and then a log-Normal regression model is used to model the positive catch; (iv) model CPUE using a Tweedie GLM. These models are defined and well-explained in Shono, so will not be discussed further here.

Details

Metrics

4 File views/ downloads
960 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Fisheries

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image