Files and links (2)
Published VersionCC BY V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study
Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol.29(5-6), pp.831-839
2020
Abstract
Aims and objectives: Describe and compare current surgical wound care practices across two hospitals in two health services districts, Australia. Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a complication of surgery and occur in up to 9.5% of surgical procedures, yet they are preventable. Despite the existence of clinical guidelines for SSI prevention, there remains high variation in wound care practice. Design: Prospective comparative design using structured observations and chart audit. Methods: A specifically developed audit tool was used to collect data on observed wound care practices, documentation of wound assessment and practice, and patients' clinical characteristics from patients' electronic medical records. Structured observations of a consecutive sample of surgical patients receiving wound care with a convenience sample of nurses were undertaken. The manuscript adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Results: In total, 154 nurses undertaking acute wound care and 257 surgical patients who received wound care were observed. Across hospitals, hand hygiene adherence after dressing change was lowest (Hospital A: 8/113, 7%; Hospital B: 16/144, 11%; χ2: 8.93, p = .347). Most wound dressing practices were similar across sites, except hand hygiene prior to dressing change (Hospital A: 107/113, 95%; Hospital B: 131/144, 91%; (χ2: 7.736, p = .021) and use of clean gloves using nontouch technique (Hospital A: 88/113, 78%; Hospital B: 90/144, 63%; χ2: 8.313, p = .016). The most commonly documented wound characteristic was wound type (Hospital A: 43/113, 38%; Hospital B: 70/144, 49%). What nurses documented differed significantly across sites (p < .05). Conclusions: Clinical variations in wound care practice are likely influenced by clinical context. Relevance to clinical practice: Using an evidence-based approach to surgical wound management will help reduce patients' risk of wound-related complications.
Details
- Title
- Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study
- Authors
- Brigid M Gillespie (Corresponding Author) - Griffith UniversityRachel Walker (Author) - Griffith UniversityFrances Lin (Author) - Griffith UniversityShelley Roberts (Author) - Griffith UniversityAnne Eskes (Author) - Amsterdam Medical Centre, NetherlandsJodie Perry (Author) - Gold Coast HealthSean Birgan (Author) - Princess Alexandra HospitalPaul Nieuwenhoven (Author) - Gold Coast HealthElizabeth Garrahy (Author) - Princess Alexandra HospitalRosalind Probert (Author) - Princess Alexandra HospitalWendy Chaboyer (Author) - Griffith University
- Publication details
- Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol.29(5-6), pp.831-839
- Publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Date published
- 2020
- DOI
- 10.1111/jocn.15135
- ISSN
- 0962-1067
- Copyright note
- Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health - Nursing; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine - Legacy
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99450444302621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
12 File views/ downloads
105 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Nursing
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites