Journal article
Working in triads: A case study of a peer review process
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol.12(1), pp.1-25
2015
Abstract
Peer review of teaching has become an accepted educational procedure in Australia to quality assure the quality of teaching practices. The institutional implementation of the peer review process can be viewed as genuine desire to improve teaching quality or an imposition from above as a measure of accountability and performativity. One approach is to conduct the peer review process as a team or a triad, involving a group of three academics. This article reviews this process of peer review through the eyes of the participants. The results of the study indicate that the peer review process upon which this study is based, has the potential to not only significantly impact academics' pedagogy but to improve teaching confidence and associated benefits in regard to evidence based teaching for promotional opportunities.
Details
- Title
- Working in triads: A case study of a peer review process
- Authors
- Peter R Grainger (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast - Faculty of Science, Health, Education and EngineeringMartin Bridgstock (Author) - Griffith UniversityTodd Houstin (Author) - Griffith UniversitySteve Drew (Author) - Griffith University
- Publication details
- Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol.12(1), pp.1-25
- Publisher
- University of Wollongong
- Date published
- 2015
- DOI
- 10.53761/1.12.1.3
- ISSN
- 1449-9789
- Copyright note
- Copyright © 2015 Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. Reproduced here in accordance with the publisher's copyright policy.
- Organisation Unit
- School of Education - Legacy; Indigenous and Transcultural Research Centre; School of Education and Tertiary Access; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99449251702621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
303 File views/ downloads
1009 Record Views