Logo image
Why patients attend emergency department for primary care type problems: View of healthcare provideers working in a remote community
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Why patients attend emergency department for primary care type problems: View of healthcare provideers working in a remote community

Yaqoot Fatima, Richard Hays, Anne Neilson, Sabina Knight and Santosh Jatrana
Rural and Remote Health, Vol.22(1), pp.1-8
2022
PMID: 35193360
pdf
article_print_7054835.13 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Australia emergency department utilisation health services primary care services remote emergency department service delivery
Introduction: Emergency department (ED) utilisation continues to increase, particularly for primary care presentations that do not require high level ED services. The reasons for this are complex, and research has focused on patient perspectives in choosing where to seek care rather than those of ED and general practitioner (GP) providers. This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the views of ED and GP providers regarding ED utilisation for primary care type health conditions in a small, remote Australian city with perhaps unique population demographics and service configuration. Methods: Service providers from the ED and general practice clinics were invited to participate in focus groups and semi-structured interviews exploring their views on ED utilisation for primary-care-type health presentations. The data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: In total, 24 healthcare providers (five GPs, seven ED practitioners, seven community nurse navigators, four Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and one Indigenous Liaison Officer) participated in focus groups discussion and interviews. The analysis identified three themes: access and logistic barriers, rational decision-making and self-perceived urgency. While there was some overlap in the healthcare providers’ perceptions, there were also strong differences between ED and GP groups. In particular, the ED group believed that GP services are less accessible for urgent appointments, whereas GPs believed that such arrangements were in place. Both groups agreed on the need for clear communication between the ED and general practice. Conclusion: ED and GP providers demonstrate similarities and differences in understanding patients’ reasons for choosing which service to access. The differences may stem from ED providers’ focus on offering a rapid resolution of acute presentations and GP providers’ focus on offering comprehensive and continuing care. Effective communication between general practice and the ED services and clearer referral pathways may help in reducing ED utilisation for less urgent primary-care-type problems.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image