Files and links (2)
What factors influence risk at rail level crossings - A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking2.48 MB
Published VersionCC BY-NC-ND V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
What factors influence risk at rail level crossings? A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking
Safety Science, Vol.138, pp.1-13
2021
Abstract
Collisions between road users (drivers, cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians) and trains at rail level crossings (RLXs) remain an intractable issue. This systematic review aimed to determine what is known regarding the factors influencing risk at RLXs, with a focus on understanding the causal relationships across the entire sociotechnical system. A systematic search identified 88 published studies. The studies were categorised according to the type of outcome measured or analysed: (1) rates and severity of crashes; (2) unsafe and non-compliant road user behaviours; and (3) road user risk perception, attitudes and beliefs. Most studies focused on unsafe and/or non-compliant road user behaviour. The factors identified within the studies as influencing risk at RLXs were classified using the Accident Mapping (AcciMap) technique, a systems analysis framework. AcciMap maps the factors that influence behaviour across six system levels ranging from Government to the operating environment. Most of the factors identified within the studies related to physical attributes of the crossing itself, its operation, and the behaviours and attributes of road users. Comparatively fewer systemic factors were identified (i.e. policy and budgeting). Few relationships between factors were identified, indicating that little consideration has been given interactions between factors (i.e. how crossing design influences end-user decision making). A research agenda is proposed based on systems thinking and the use of a ‘many model’ approach to understand and address risk at RLXs.
Details
- Title
- What factors influence risk at rail level crossings? A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking
- Authors
- Gemma J.M Read (Corresponding Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Human Factors and Systems ScienceJolene A Cox (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Human Factors and Systems ScienceAdam Hulme (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Human Factors and Systems ScienceAnjum Naweed (Author) - Central Queensland UniversityPaul M Salmon (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Human Factors and Systems Science
- Publication details
- Safety Science, Vol.138, pp.1-13
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Date published
- 2021
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105207
- ISSN
- 0925-7535
- Copyright note
- © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
- Organisation Unit
- Centre for Human Factors and Systems Science; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Health - Psychology; School of Law and Society
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99511303302621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
67 File views/ downloads
104 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Engineering, Industrial
- Operations Research & Management Science
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites