Logo image
What drives road rage? A systematic review on the psychological correlates of aggressive driving behavior
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

What drives road rage? A systematic review on the psychological correlates of aggressive driving behavior

Steven Love and Michelle Nicolls
Journal of Safety Research, Vol.94, pp.92-109
2025
PMID: 40930667
pdf
1-s2.0-S0022437525000866-main3.12 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

driving anger personality self-regulation psychopathology attitudes
Introduction: Despite decades of research and intervention, aggressive driving behavior (ADB) remains a prevalent risk on our roads. This study aimed to systematically review how drivers’ personality traits, perceptual tendencies, self-regulatory capacity, and psychological functioning, have been linked to the engagement of ADBs. Method: Under guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a literature search was performed in four databases, followed by a manual search in Google Scholar. Original research studies were eligible for the review if they used general driver samples, included self-reported variables relating to both an ADB and a relevant psychological factor, and implemented bivariate correlational analyses. Following an in-depth screening process on a total of 2,869 unique publications, 148 articles met the criteria for review. Results: The review identified a number of psychological correlates that exhibited consistent relationships with instrumental and hostile ADBs. Most notably, antisocial personality traits (e.g., the dark triad), problematic attitudes towards ADBs and others, self-regulatory deficits (e.g., emotion dysregulation), and psychological dysfunction (e.g., maladaptive cognitive-emotional processes) were conducive to engagement in ADBs. In contrast, adaptive personality traits (e.g., altruism), unfavorable attitudes towards ADBs, self-regulatory ability (e.g., emotional intelligence), and psychological functioning (e.g., wellbeing) were negatively associated with ADBs. However, a major limitation of the reviewed literature was the lack of standardization for the definition and measurement of specific ADBs. Practical Applications: It was suggested that future research could focus on developing a consensus for the conceptualization of ADB and adopt more comprehensive approaches to ADB that consider underlying interactions between the psychological correlates of the behaviors.

Details

Metrics

12 File views/ downloads
96 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Ergonomics
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Transportation

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image