What do clinicians perceive as the effective implementation strategies for TREAT journal clubs? A qualitative study

Rachel Wenke; Jodie Wiseman; Paulina Stehlik; Caitlin Brandenburg; Katherine Richards; Sharon Mickan

doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06929-x

Back

What do clinicians perceive as the effective implementation strategies for TREAT journal clubs? A qualitative study

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

What do clinicians perceive as the effective implementation strategies for TREAT journal clubs? A qualitative study

Rachel Wenke, Jodie Wiseman, Paulina Stehlik, Caitlin Brandenburg, Katherine Richards and Sharon Mickan

BMC Medical Education, Vol.25, pp.1-12

2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06929-x

PMCID: PMC11931826

PMID: 40122791

Files and links (1)

pdf

s12909-025-06929-x1.17 MBDownload View

Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

journal club

evidence-based practice

allied health

sustainability

Background Journal clubs have long been recognised as a potential tool for supporting evidence-based practice skills and culture, however they can be challenging to implement and sustain in clinical settings. While the TREAT journal club format was developed to address some of these challenges; it is unclear which strategies are most helpful in supporting ongoing sustainability. To further this enquiry, the aim of this study was to identify clinician’s perspectives of the most effective implementation strategies for supporting sustainable TREAT journal club attendance, culture and satisfaction. Methods Clinicians, clinician-facilitators, and research mentors were recruited from six allied health journal clubs who participated in the TREAT journal club format within a single hospital and health service. Participants were invited to attend focus groups at 10 months and 16-months following participation in their journal club. Focus group questions explored which strategies participants felt were most effective during implementation of the journal club, what outcomes they led to and what if any contextual factors influenced these outcomes. Data analysis involved an inductive and deductive approach and the formation of context- mechanism-outcome configurations drawing from elements of a realist evaluation. Results Eighteen focus groups were conducted separately with 47 clinician participants, 12 clinician-facilitators, and 6 research mentors. Strategies reported to be the most effective related to clinical relevance and application of the topic, group participation (i.e., group prioritisation of topics, group discussion), consistency, structure (i.e., protected time, structured appraisal tool, timetabling) and mentoring. These were further synthesised within 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations which identified contexts that influenced outcomes. For example, clinicians reported smaller and single profession journal clubs enhanced outcomes relating to attendance, culture and practice changes when implementing the strategy of discussing the article’s application to practice. Conclusion Clinicians report several strategies which may enhance journal club attendance and satisfaction, EBP culture, and knowledge and skills of clinicians when implementing a TREAT journal club for up to 16-months. Findings emphasise the importance of journal club topics being identified and prioritised by clinicians as a group to maximise relevance and clinician buy-in. Strategies discussed may be useful for services to consider when implementing journal clubs, taking into consideration specific contexts.

Details

Title: What do clinicians perceive as the effective implementation strategies for TREAT journal clubs? A qualitative study
Authors: Rachel Wenke (Corresponding Author) - Bond University
Jodie Wiseman - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Occupational Therapy
Paulina Stehlik - Bond University
Caitlin Brandenburg (Corresponding Author) - Bond University
Katherine Richards - Gold Coast Health
Sharon Mickan - Bond University
Publication details: BMC Medical Education, Vol.25, pp.1-12
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Date published: 2025
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06929-x
ISSN: 1472-6920
PMID: 40122791; PMC11931826
Copyright note: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Data Availability: Deidentified data is available on request.
Organisation Unit: Healthy Ageing Research Cluster; School of Health - Occupational Therapy
Language: English
Record Identifier: 991127099502621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

46 Record Views

1 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Education & Educational Research; Education, Scientific Disciplines

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: SDGs from InCites