Logo image
What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?

P C Gotzsche, J P Kassirer, Karen L Woolley, E Wager, A Jacobs, A Gertel and C Hamilton
PLoS Medicine, Vol.6(2), pp.0122-0125
2009
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)72.83 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023View
Published Version

Abstract

medical literature ghostwriting
Background to the debate: Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.

Details

Metrics

29 File views/ downloads
616 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Medicine, General & Internal

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image