Logo image
Valuing technology investments: use real options thinking but forget real options valuation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Valuing technology investments: use real options thinking but forget real options valuation

P R Steffens and Evan J Douglas
International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, Vol.1(1), pp.58-77
2007
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version94.17 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
http://www.inderscience.com/storage/f121069537111248.pdfView
Webpage

Abstract

Business and Management technology investments real options valuation Decision Tree Analysis (DTA)
When facing risky technology investments or ventures 'real option thinking' - the managerial flexibility to capitalise on opportunities when they arise and/or to minimise the impact of threats - is precisely what is needed. Notwithstanding this, we argue Real Options Valuation (ROV) is inferior to traditional decision tree analysis for this context. Our reasoning is twofold. Firstly, ROV techniques provide a sophisticated treatment of market risks, but do not deal with firm-specific risks. However, the elevated risk facing technology ventures is predominantly firm-specific risk. Secondly, ROV has a severe practical limitation for new technology ventures. The starting point for ROV is to value the "underlying asset" - the venture/project in the absence of the 'real options' - using discounted cash flow techniques. But the risk profile/discount rate can not be established for this nonsensical hypothetical entity - because the 'real options' are an integral part of technology venture.

Details

Metrics

143 File views/ downloads
481 Record Views
Logo image