Logo image
Validation of a skinfold based index for tracking proportional changes in lean mass
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Validation of a skinfold based index for tracking proportional changes in lean mass

Gary J Slater, G M Duthie, D B Pyne and W G Hopkins
British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol.40(3), pp.208-213
2006
PMCID: PMC2491976
PMID: 16505075
pdf
PDF - Published Version234.17 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.019794View
Published Version

Abstract

Human Movement and Sports Science Nutrition and Dietetics elite athlete lean mass index rugby union skinfold
Background: The lean mass index (LMI) is a new empirical measure that tracks within-subject proportional changes in body mass adjusted for changes in skinfold thickness. Objective: To compare the ability of the LMI and other skinfold derived measures of lean mass to monitor changes in lean mass. Methods: 20 elite rugby union players undertook full anthropometric profiles on two occasions 10 weeks apart to calculate the LMI and five skinfold based measures of lean mass. Hydrodensitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual energy × ray absorptiometry provided a criterion choice, four compartment (4C) measure of lean mass for validation purposes. Regression based measures of validity, derived for within-subject proportional changes through log transformation, included correlation coefficients and standard errors of the estimate. Results: The correlation between change scores for the LMI and 4C lean mass was moderate (0.37, 90% confidence interval -0.01 to 0.66) and similar to the correlations for the other practical measures of lean mass (range 0.26 to 0.42). Standard errors of the estimate for the practical measures were in the range of 2.8-2.9%. The LMI correctly identified the direction of change in 4C lean mass for 14 of the 20 athletes, compared with 11 to 13 for the other practical measures of lean mass. Conclusions: The LMI is probably as good as other skinfold based measures for tracking lean mass and is theoretically more appropriate. Given the impracticality of the 4C criterion measure for routine field use, the LMI may offer a convenient alternative for monitoring physique changes, provided its utility is established under various conditions.

Details

Metrics

45 File views/ downloads
1016 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
Logo image