Logo image
Back
Validating a scale to measure respectful maternity care in Australia: Challenges and recommendations
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Validating a scale to measure respectful maternity care in Australia: Challenges and recommendations

Bec Jenkinson, Lauren Kearney, Mary Kynn, Rachel Reed, Rachael Nugent, Jocelyn Toohill and Fiona Bogossian
Midwifery, Vol.103, pp.1-8
2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103090
PMID: 34332313
Appears in  UniSC Diversity and Inclusion Research Collection
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103090View
Published Version

Abstract

Childbirth Disrespect and abuse Human rights Provider-patient communication Respectful maternity care Scale UniSC Diversity Area - Cultural and Linguistic Diversity UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages
Objective: Respectful maternity care is a pervasive human rights issue, but little is known about its realisation in Australia. Two scales, developed in North America, measure key aspects of respectful maternity care: the Mothers on Respect Index and Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making scale. This study aimed to validate these two scales in Queensland, Australia, and to determine the extent to which women currently experience respectful maternity care and autonomy in decision making. Design: A sequential two-phase study. A focus group reviewed the scales, made adaptations to scale items and completed a Content Validation Survey. The Respectful Maternity Care in Queensland survey, comprising the validated Australian scales and demographic questions was distributed online in early 2020. Setting: Queensland, Australia. Participants: Focus group involved women (n=10) who were aged over 18, English-speaking, and had given birth during the preceding two years. All women who had birthed in Queensland between September 2019 and February 2020, were eligible to participate in the cross-sectional survey. 161 women participated in the survey. Measurements and findings: Item content validity (>0.78) was established for all but one item. Scale content validity was established for both scales (0.92 and 0.99 respectively). Survey participants (n= 161) were mostly married/partnered (95%), heterosexual (93%), tertiary educated (47%), Caucasian (88%), and had experienced a range of maternity models of care. Median scores on each scale (74 and 26 respectively) indicated that participants felt well respected and highly autonomous. Free-text comments highlighted the importance of relationship-based care. Key conclusions: Both scales appear valid for use in Australia. Although most participants reported high levels of respect and autonomy, the proportion of participants who had experienced continuity of midwifery care was also high. Implications for practice: Both scales could be routinely deployed as patient reported experience measures in Australia, broadening the data that informs maternity service planning and delivery.

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
108 Record Views
14 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Nursing

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image