Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training

Dean Ritchie; Justin WL Keogh; Peter Reaburn; Jonathan D Bartlett

doi:10.7717/peerj.10031

Back

Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training

Dean Ritchie, Justin WL Keogh, Peter Reaburn and Jonathan D Bartlett

PeerJ, Vol.8, e10031

2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10031

PMID: 33083124

Files and links (2)

pdf

Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training1.25 MBDownload View

Published VersionCC BY V4.0, Open Access

url

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10031View

Published Version

Abstract

Training organisation

Periodisation

Team sport

Post-activation performance enhancement

Background: Little is known about contrast training and post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in a same day concurrent training model. The aim of the current study was to examine the use of two short duration (1-min and 4-min) recovery periods on drop jump performance in same day concurrently trained athletes. Methods: Ten professional Australian Rules footballers (age, 20.6 ± 1.9 yr; height, 184.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass, 85.8 ± 8.4 kg) completed two resistance training sessions with different PAPE recovery durations; 1-min and 4-min, 1 h following a field-based endurance session. Baseline (pre) drop jumps were compared to post-test maximal drop jumps, performed after each set of three squats (where each participant was encouraged to lift as heavy as they could), to determine changes between 1-min and 4-min recovery periods. Data were analysed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at P ≤ 0.05). Corrected Hedges’ g standardised effect sizes ±95% confidence limits were calculated using group means ± SDs. Results: There were no significant differences between baseline and experimental sets 1, 2 and 3 for reactive strength index (RSI), flight time, and total and relative impulse for either recovery duration. However, for contact time, 1-min baseline was significantly different from set 2 (mean difference; 95% CI [0.029; 0.000–0.057 s], P = 0.047, ES; 95% CI [−0.27; −1.20 to 0.66]). For RSI and flight time, 1-min was significantly higher than 4-min (RSI: 0.367; 0.091 to 0.642, P = 0.010, ES; 95% CI [0.52; −0.37 to 1.42]; flight time: 0.033; 0.003 to 0.063 s, P = 0.027, ES; 95% CI [0.86; −0.06 to 1.78]). Discussion: Short recovery periods of 1-min may be a time-efficient form of prescribing strength-power exercise in contrast loading schemes. Longer recovery periods do not appear to benefit immediate, subsequent performance.

Details

Title: Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
Authors: Dean Ritchie (Author) - Bond University
Justin WL Keogh (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland
Peter Reaburn (Author) - Bond University
Jonathan D Bartlett (Author) - Bond University
Publication details: PeerJ, Vol.8, e10031
Publisher: PeerJ, Ltd.
Date published: 2020
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10031
ISSN: 2167-8359
PMID: 33083124
Copyright note: Copyright (c) 2020 Ritchie et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
Organisation Unit: University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99482292202621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

48 Record Views

4 Times Cited - Web of Science

See more details

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration; International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Sport Sciences