Logo image
Back
Using the decision ladder to understand road user decision making at actively controlled rail level crossings
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Using the decision ladder to understand road user decision making at actively controlled rail level crossings

Christine M Mulvihill, Paul M Salmon, Vanessa Beanland, Michael G Lenne, Gemma J M Read, Guy H Walker and Neville A Stanton
Applied Ergonomics, Vol.56, pp.1-10
2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.013
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.013View
Published Version

Abstract

rail level crossings road users decision making decision ladder safety
Rail level crossings (RLXs) represent a key strategic risk for railways worldwide. Despite enforcement and engineering countermeasures, user behaviour at RLXs can often confound expectations and erode safety. Research in this area is limited by a relative absence of insights into actual decision making processes and a focus on only a subset of road user types. One-hundred and sixty-six road users (drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians) completed a diary entry for each of 457 naturalistic encounters with RLXs when a train was approaching. The final eligible sample comprised 94 participants and 248 encounters at actively controlled crossings where a violation of the active warnings was possible. The diary incorporated Critical Decision Method probe questions, which enabled user responses to be mapped onto Rasmussen's decision ladder. Twelve percent of crossing events were non-compliant. The underlying decision making was compared to compliant events and a reference decision model to reveal important differences in the structure and type of decision making within and between road user groups. The findings show that engineering countermeasures intended to improve decision making (e.g. flashing lights), may have the opposite effect for some users because the system permits a high level of flexibility for circumvention. Non-motorised users were more likely to access information outside of the warning signals because of their ability to achieve greater proximity to the train tracks and the train itself. The major conundrum in resolving these issues is whether to restrict the amount of time and information available to users so that it cannot be used for circumventing the system or provide more information to help users make safe decisions.

Details

Metrics

6 File views/ downloads
1152 Record Views
21 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Engineering, Industrial
Ergonomics
Psychology, Applied

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Source: InCites

Logo image