Logo image
Turning the Titanic: inertia and the drivers of climate change education
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Turning the Titanic: inertia and the drivers of climate change education

Shireen J Fahey, John Labadie and Noel Meyers
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol.6(1), pp.44-62
2014
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version549.18 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2013-0003View
Published Version

Abstract

curriculum development tertiary education climate change education Australian educational standards USA educational standards
Purpose - This paper presents the challenges, external drivers and internal inertia faced by curriculum designers and implementers at institutions of higher education. The challenges to academics from competing factors are presented: internal resistance to changing existing curricula versus the necessity to continuously evolve programmes to reflect a dynamic, uncertain future. The necessity to prepare future leaders to face global issues such as climate change, dictates changing curricula to reflect changing personal, environmental and societal needs. Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses the case study method to examine two models of climate change curriculum design and renewal. One model, from an Australian university, is based upon national education standards and the second is a non standards-based curriculum design, developed and delivered by a partnership of four North American universities. Findings - The key findings from this study are that the highest level of participation by internal-to-the-programme academics and administrators is required. Programme quality, delivery and content alignment may be compromised with either stand-alone course delivery and learning outcomes, or if courses are developed independently of others in the programme. National educational standards can be effective tools to guide course and programme management, monitoring, review and updating. Student feedback is valuable: it provides a compelling set of data to guide programme design and delivery and should be sought as part of a curriculum renewal process. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for postgraduate level curricula design, implementation and program evaluation. Originality/value - The paper is the first to compare, contrast and critique a national standards-based, higher education curriculum and a non standards-based curriculum.

Details

Metrics

148 File views/ downloads
774 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education
#10 Reduced Inequalities

Source: InCites

Logo image