Logo image
Train drivers' ratings of perceived risk associated with illegal behaviours at level-crossings
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Train drivers' ratings of perceived risk associated with illegal behaviours at level-crossings

Jeremy D Davey, Angela M Wallace, Nicholas J Stenson and James E Freeman
Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, Australia and New Zealand, Vol.23(5), pp.445-450
2007
pdf
PDF - Author Accepted Version64.16 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
http://www.wolterskluwer.cch.com.au/employment-whs/journalhseView
Webpage

Abstract

level crossings motorist behaviour risk train drivers
Accidents between motorists and trains at road/rail level crossings represent a significant proportion of Australia's rail toll. This article attempts to identify the motorist behaviours that are most instrumental in contributing to such accidents. Forty-seven train drivers (including representatives from both urban and regional areas) were provided with a list of commonly observed illegal motorist behaviours and were asked to rate each of them from lowest to highest risk. In general, the highest rated behaviours for risk reflected wilful violations by motorists (such as trying to beat the train over the crossing, and going through the crossing as soon as the train had passed), and the study identified few differences between the risk ratings for urban and regional train drivers (indicating that they share a similar view regardless of their operating environment). This study compiled a hierarchy of risk from a sample of commonly observed level crossing motorist behaviours, and the implications for the use of the findings towards improved level crossing safety are discussed.

Details

Metrics

49 File views/ downloads
167 Record Views
Logo image