Logo image
Thinking outside the plot: monitoring forest biodiversity for social-ecological research
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Thinking outside the plot: monitoring forest biodiversity for social-ecological research

Carl F Salk, Robin L Chazdon and Daniel Waiswa
Ecology and Society, Vol.25(1), 7
2020
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)4.36 MBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11223-250107View
Published Version

Abstract

biodiversity monitoring community-based monitoring conservation participatory monitoring socio-ecological studies
Protecting biodiversity, either for its own sake or for its value to humanity, is a principal goal of conservation efforts worldwide. For this reason, many studies on the social science of resource management and governance seek to quantify biodiversity outcomes. Here, we focus on the International Forestry Resources and Institutions program to demonstrate some of the challenges of quantitative biodiversity assessment and suggest ways to overcome them. One of this program's research goals is to understand the causes of biodiversity loss, which is explicitly assessed using plot-based forest sampling. Plot-based methods to capture biodiversity changes require huge amounts of data. Even if sampling is sufficient, existing protocols can only capture changes in the types of species actually sampled, typically trees. Other elements of biodiversity are not censused, including animals, herbs, shrubs, fungi, and epiphytes that may provide medicine, food, wildlife habitat, trade items, or cultural goods. Using case studies of two sites in Uganda, we demonstrate that more spatially extensive surveys targeting multiple types of data can give a broader picture of forest status and changes than can plot-based sampling alone; many relevant variables can be observed while traveling among plot points with little additional effort. Reviewing the ecological literature, we identify correlates of forest status that can supplement plot-based sampling. These include large trees, epiphyte-laden trees, culturally or commercially valuable species, large stumps, and evidence of hunting and trapping. Further, data elicited from local resource users can play an important role in biodiversity monitoring. These findings suggest that effective biodiversity monitoring may be within easier reach than previously thought, although robust comparisons among sites remains a challenge, especially when climate, soils, or site history differ greatly.

Details

Metrics

225 File views/ downloads
229 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Ecology
Environmental Studies

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#1 No Poverty
#2 Zero Hunger
#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image