Logo image
“There’s nothing standard about standards”: exploring tensions between two standards documents in higher education
Journal article   Peer reviewed

“There’s nothing standard about standards”: exploring tensions between two standards documents in higher education

Terri Bourke and Jennifer Carter
Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol.40(3), pp.409-424
2016
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144730View
Published Version

Abstract

Foucault geography standards
Quality in education at the tertiary level is constantly questioned, and increasingly "professional standards" are offered as the solution to the perceived decline in quality. Foucauldian archaeological analysis of teacher graduate and geography graduate standards in Australia is conducted, revealing tensions between the different document sets. Teacher graduate standards reflect two discourses (one of knowledge and understanding, and one of skills) that are anti-intellectual and based on jargon and formulaic prescriptions. In contrast, disciplinary standards give primacy to geography as an intellectual inquiry such that its knowledge and understanding, skills, and concepts lead to progressively higher order thinking in graduates.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
Geography

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Logo image