Logo image
The ‘three-pillars model of regulation’: a fusion of governance models for private security
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The ‘three-pillars model of regulation’: a fusion of governance models for private security

Peter Stiernstedt, Mark Button, Timothy Prenzler and Rick Sarre
Security Journal, Vol.34(2), pp.247-260
2021
pdf
The ‘three-pillars model of regulation’ - a fusion of governance models for private security290.09 kBDownloadView
Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-019-00224-3View
Published Version

Abstract

governance private security public interest regulation security industry
The growth in size, role and authority of private security has triggered a variety of regulatory reactions. These have stimulated a growing academic debate on preferred regulatory models. This paper summarizes the key existing models of regulation. It then provides a critique of the observations of Loader and White (Regul Gov 11(2):166-184, 2017) on the existing models. It critically examines their proposed model and outlines how we believe that private security regulation can be enhanced by setting out 'three-pillars' of effective regulation. The literature and research points towards the need for a regulatory pillar that enhances the wider private security sector, a distributive pillar that addresses security inequality and lastly a responsibility pillar designed to align the private security industry with the public interest.

Details

Metrics

101 File views/ downloads
77 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Criminology & Penology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Source: InCites

Logo image