Logo image
The metacognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder and metacognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The metacognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder and metacognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review

Renee L Brown, Andrew Wood, Janet D Carter and Lee Kannis‐Dymand
Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol.29(1), pp.131-146
2022
PMID: 34155731
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2633View
Published Version

Abstract

UniSC Diversity Area - Disability and Inclusion
The metacognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) implicates meta-cognitive beliefs, meta-memory beliefs and metacognitive control strategies in perpetuating and maintaining symptoms of PTSD. Despite this expanding area of research, the evidence for the metacognitive model of PTSD has not been reviewed. A systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Searches across MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycNET, as well as reference lists of the included studies (2004 to March 2020), yielded 221 records. Two independent reviewers screened articles, which were included where the impact of the constructs of interest on PTSD symptoms was investigated within the framework of the metacognitive model for PTSD. Eighteen articles were included in the review. Eleven studies were determined to have good methodological robustness. Metacognitive therapy for PTSD demonstrated reductions in symptoms from pretreatment to post-treatment, which were maintained at follow-up. Predictors of greater PTSD symptom severity included metacognitive beliefs, meta-memory beliefs, and worry, punishment, thought suppression, experiential avoidance, and rumination. Overall, support was found for the validity of the metacognitive model of PTSD. K E Y W O R D S metacognitive beliefs, meta-memory, PTSD, situational processing strategies, thought control strategies 1 | INTRODUCTION Internationally, over 67% of the population will be exposed to trauma, where 3.21% of individuals will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Dückers et al., 2016). The metacognitive model of PTSD by Wells and Sembi (2004a) suggests that the normal emotional processing of a traumatic event can be disrupted by dysfunctional beliefs about thinking (metacognitive beliefs) and dysfunctional beliefs about the traumatic memory (meta-memory beliefs). Wells (2009) describes positive beliefs about worry—referred to from here as positive metacognitive beliefs—which include beliefs about the usefulness of worry, rumination and monitoring threat (e.g., 'Worrying helps me cope'; Wells & Cartwright-Hatton, 2004). Negative metacognitive beliefs are those beliefs about the uncontrollability of thoughts (e.g., 'When I start worrying, I cannot stop') and the danger of thoughts (e.g., 'My worrying is dangerous for me'). Bennett and Wells (2010) further describe positive meta-memory beliefs (e.g., 'I must try to remember all of the details of the trauma so that I can understand why me') and negative meta-memory beliefs (e.g., 'gaps in my memory for the event are preventing me from getting over it'). These meta-memory beliefs perpetuate the cyclical and maladaptive processing of the memory (Wells & Sembi, 2004a). In other theoretical models of PTSD, memory is conceptualized as disorganized and fragmented, and addressing the trauma memory is central within therapy (Brewin et al., 1996; Ehlers & Clark, 2000). However, the metacognitive model of PTSD proposes that metacognitive beliefs

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image