Logo image
The mechanical and inflammatory low back pain (MIL) index: development and validation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The mechanical and inflammatory low back pain (MIL) index: development and validation

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, Andre Farasyn, Charles P Gabel and Juan Luciano
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol.15, 12
2014
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)549.99 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CCBY_V2.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-12View
Published Version

Abstract

Clinical Sciences low back pain psychometrics properties pain measurement screening tool inflammatory mechanical
Background: The purpose of this study was the development of a valid and reliable "Mechanical and Inflammatory Low Back Pain Index" (MIL) for assessment of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). This 7-item tool assists practitioners in determining whether symptoms are predominantly mechanical or inflammatory. Methods Participants (n= 170, 96 females, age = 38±14 years-old) with NSLP were referred to two Spanish physiotherapy clinics and completed the MIL and the following measures: the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), SF-12 and "Backache Index" (BAI) physical assessment test. For test-retest reliability, 37 consecutive patients were assessed at baseline and three days later during a non-treatment period. Face and content validity, practical characteristics, factor analysis, internal consistency, discriminant validity and convergent validity were assessed from the full sample. Results A total of 27 potential items that had been identified for inclusion were subsequently reduced to 11 by an expert panel. Four items were then removed due to cross-loading under confirmatory factor analysis where a two-factor model yielded a good fit to the data (χ2 = 14.80, df = 13, p = 0.37, CFI = 0.98, and RMSEA = 0.029). The internal consistency was moderate (α = 0.68 for MLBP; 0.72 for ILBP), test-retest reliability high (ICC = 0.91; 95%CI = 0.88-0.93) and discriminant validity good for either MLBP (AUC = 0.74) and ILBP (AUC = 0.92). Convergent validity was demonstrated through similar but weak correlations between the ILBP and both the RMQ and BAI (r = 0.34, p less than 0.001) and the MLBP and BAI (r = 0.38, p less than 0.001). Conclusions The MIL is a valid and reliable clinical tool for patients with NSLBP that discriminates between mechanical and inflammatory LBP.

Details

Metrics

61 File views/ downloads
840 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Orthopedics
Rheumatology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image