Logo image
The limitations of commercial serological assays for detection of chlamydial infections in Australian livestock
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The limitations of commercial serological assays for detection of chlamydial infections in Australian livestock

Sankhya Bommana, Martina Jelocnik, Nicole Borel, Ian Marsh, Scott Carver and Adam Polkinghorne
Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol.68(4), pp.627-632
2019
url
https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000951View
Published Version

Abstract

serology peptide antigen based ELISA chlamydia pecorum ovine enzootic abortion whole antigen based ELISA chlamydia abortus
Chlamydia pecorum and Chlamydia abortus are related ruminant pathogens endemic to different global regions. Potential co-infections combined with the lack of species-specific serological assays challenge accurate diagnosis. Serological screening revealed low C. abortus seropositivity with the peptide-based ELISA (1/84; 1.2%) in Australian sheep yet moderate seropositivity in a Swiss flock with history of C. abortus-associated abortions (17/63; 26.9%). By whole cell antigen complement fixation tests (CFT) and ELISA, chlamydial seropositivity was significantly higher in all groups, suggesting cross-reactivity between these two chlamydial species and non-specificity of the tests. However, only C. pecorum DNA could be detected by qPCR in Chlamydia seropositive Australian animals screened, suggesting chlamydial seropositivity was due to cross-reactivity with endemic C. pecorum infections. These results suggest ascribing Chlamydia seropositivity to chlamydial species in livestock using whole-cell antigen CFT or ELISA should be treated with caution; and that peptide-based ELISA and qPCR provide greater chlamydial species-specificity.

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
372 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Microbiology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image