Logo image
The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics

Xueyuan Gao, Peter B. Reich, Jeffrey R. Vincent, Matthew E. Fagan, Robin L. Chazdon, Steffen Fritz, Dmitry Schepaschenko, Matthew D. Potts, Matthew C. Hansen, Martin Jung, …
Nature Communications, Vol.16(1), pp.1-6
2025
PMID: 40603883
pdf
s41467-025-59196-11.17 MBDownloadView
Published VersionCC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

forest ecology restoration ecology tropical ecology
Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982–2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives. Tree cover gains in the moist tropics (1982–2015) were 56% naturally regenerated forests and 27% managed tree systems, with forest type influencing carbon recovery. Effective forest restoration requires robust tracking of forest types established by restoration efforts.

Details

Metrics

9 File views/ downloads
54 Record Views
Logo image