Logo image
The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region

Leonie Harvey, Matthew Bousson, Chris McLellan and Dale Lovell
Journal of Human Kinetics, Vol.56(1), pp.119-126
2017
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)278.26 kBDownloadView
Published Version PDF - Published Version (Open Access) Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V3.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029View
Published Version

Abstract

repeated WAnT upper body lower body
The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23±2 years, 84±16.1 kg, 178.5±7.4 cm) volunteered to complete two repeated WAnT protocols (either lower body WAnT followed by an upper body WAnTor vice versa) on two separate testing occasions. The upper body WAnT was conducted on a modified electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 5% bodyweight. The lower body WAnT was conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 7.5% bodyweight. Participants had a 1 minute rest period for transition between WAnTs. Data are reported as mean±standard deviation. No significant differences were identified in power indices for the lower body between 30 s WAnTs. When the upper body WAnT was performed 2nd, absolute peak power (p < 0.01), mean power (p < 0.001) and relative mean power (p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to when the upper body WAnT was performed 1st. The value of maximum revolutions per minute was significantly lower (p < 0.001) when the upper body WAnT was performed after the lower body WAnT, compared to when it was performed 1st (193.3±11.4 1st vs 179.8±14.4 2nd). Previous upper body sprint exercise does not significantly affect lower body sprint exercise; however, previous lower body sprint exercise severely compromises subsequent upper body sprint performance.

Details

Metrics

57 File views/ downloads
730 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
Logo image