Logo image
The Development of a Valid and Reliable Questionnaire to Measure Menstrual Cycle and Hormonal Contraceptive Knowledge Among Athletes and Sports Performance Support Staff
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Development of a Valid and Reliable Questionnaire to Measure Menstrual Cycle and Hormonal Contraceptive Knowledge Among Athletes and Sports Performance Support Staff

Brianna Larsen, Erica Greet, Stephen P. Bird, Karlee Quinn, Alice McNamara and John Owen Osborne
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, Vol.35(11), pp.1-19
2025
PMCID: PMC12619082
PMID: 41239834
pdf
Larsen et al. - 2025 - The Development of a Valid and Reliable Questionnaire to Measure Menstrual Cycle and Hormonal Contra356.33 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

contraception menstruation sport survey
This study aimed to develop the first valid questionnaire to assess menstrual cycle (MC) and hormonal contraceptive (HC) knowledge in athletes and sports performance support staff. Questions were developed following a literature review and four knowledge domains were identified: (1) Normal MC Function, (2) MC Dysfunction, (3) Oral Contraceptive Pills, and (4) Other HCs. Experts (n = 6) reviewed the initial questionnaire, followed by pre-testing with athletes and support staff (n = 19). Validity (item analysis, construct validity) and reliability (test–retest, internal consistency) were assessed following questionnaire administration to athletes and staff without MC education (“Low Knowledge” [LK] group; n = 156) and “High Knowledge” [HK] participants (n = 30) with MC education. Most (n = 122) LK participants completed the questionnaire twice to assess test–retest reliability. Expert review showed good agreement (> 80%) on item clarity and relevancy and pre-testing indicated good content and face validity. The HK group scored significantly higher than LK participants across the questionnaire (43 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 10; p < 0.001; d = 1.48 [1.05, 1.90]) and all knowledge domains (p < 0.05). High item discrimination parameters were found for all domains, indicating effective discrimination between respondents with different knowledge levels. Test–retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient estimates from 0.93 [0.90, 0.95] to 0.98 [0.96, 0.99]), with all domains showing good-to-excellent reliability. Internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was considered acceptable (0.93 [0.92, 0.95]; α ≥ 0.7). This questionnaire delivers a valid and reliable tool to assess MC and HC knowledge amongst athletes and support staff and is recommended to guide and evaluate educational interventions to improve menstrual health literacy within sport.

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
16 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
Logo image