Logo image
The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Follow-up After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Follow-up After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Katharina Bolz, R W Crawford, B Donnelly, S L Whitehouse and N Graves
Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol.25(2), pp.191-196
2010
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.12.009View
Published Version

Abstract

total hip arthroplasty follow-up economic analysis Markov model cost-effectiveness cohort simulation
Routine postsurgery assessment of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recommended in many countries. Whether the benefits of this activity are justified by the costs is not known. We used a decision-analytic Markov model to compare the costs and health outcomes of 3 different follow-up strategies after primary THA. If there is no routine follow-up of patients for 7 years after primary THA, there would be cost savings between AU$6.5 and $11.9 million and gains of between 1.8 and 8.8 quality-adjusted life years. Policy makers should investigate less resource-intensive alternatives to common routine postsurgical assessment. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Orthopedics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image