The Autonomy Paradox and Performing Dependence—Responsibility and Resistance at an Opioid Substitution Treatment Service

Oliver Birch; Peter Adams; Bruce Cohen; David Newcombe

doi:10.1177/00914509251393882

Back

The Autonomy Paradox and Performing Dependence—Responsibility and Resistance at an Opioid Substitution Treatment Service

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

The Autonomy Paradox and Performing Dependence—Responsibility and Resistance at an Opioid Substitution Treatment Service

Oliver Birch, Peter Adams, Bruce Cohen and David Newcombe

Contemporary Drug Problems, Vol.53(2), pp.243-261

2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509251393882

Files and links (1)

pdf

birch-et-al-2025-the-autonomy-paradox-and-performing-dependence-responsibility-and-resistance-at-an-opioid-substitution1.10 MBDownload View

Published Version (Advanced Access) Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

autonomy

dependence

ethnography

opioid substitution therapy

performativity

responsibility

Historically, opioid use has been problematized to serve various socio-political interests. To understand the present construction and management of opioid “dependence,” across 2023, an Opioid Substitution Treatment service was assessed in Aotearoa, New Zealand. This article outlines the day-to-day work at this service, to assess how it is informed by treatment guidelines, and the interests of staff, service users, and policy makers. Using Institutional Ethnography, nine informants were interviewed from these groups, their work at the service was observed, and the texts that were activated through this work (such as treatment guidelines) were assessed. Findings are organized into a map of the treatment institution; informants’ work is connected by the associated texts. This map is described to show the interests that pervaded these, and how they were activated in informants’ work, and informed their understandings of opioid dependence. From these texts to the talk of the informants, there is a persistent understanding of “successful recovery” as requiring individuals to become self-responsible. However, though dominant (responsibilizing) modes of constructing opioid dependence and recovery are identified, these manifest paradoxically in practice, as service user autonomy is both promoted and restricted. How service users described themselves and their opioid use is equally varied, but also leveraged opportunistically by this group. It is argued that there is evidence of a complex performativity of dependence amongst the research informants. Service users understood themselves and their dependence in anticipation of the expectations of the service, but also in resistance to these, despite the service's seeming intent.

Details

Title: The Autonomy Paradox and Performing Dependence—Responsibility and Resistance at an Opioid Substitution Treatment Service
Authors: Oliver Birch (Corresponding Author) - University of Auckland
Peter Adams - University of Auckland
Bruce Cohen - University of Auckland
David Newcombe - University of Auckland
Publication details: Contemporary Drug Problems, Vol.53(2), pp.243-261
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Date published: 2026
DOI: 10.1177/00914509251393882
ISSN: 2163-1808
Copyright note: © The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Organisation Unit: School of Health - Psychology
Language: English
Record Identifier: 991196051002621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

3 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas: Substance Abuse