Logo image
Teaching and Assessing Problem Solving: An Example of an Incremental Approach to Using IRAC in Legal Education
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Teaching and Assessing Problem Solving: An Example of an Incremental Approach to Using IRAC in Legal Education

Kelley Burton
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol.13(5), 20
2016
pdf
PDF - Published Version580.83 kBDownloadView
Published Version PDF - Published Version Open Access
url
http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol13/iss5/20View
Webpage

Abstract

Education Systems Curriculum and Pedagogy problem solving legal reasoning thinking skills IRAC assessment
Legal reasoning is a type of problem solving, and is situated within thinking skills, one of the six threshold learning outcomes established under the auspices of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council's Bachelor of Laws Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Statement. The threshold learning outcomes define what law graduates are 'expected to know, understand and be able to do as a result of learning' (Kift et al., 2010, p. 9). The assessment of legal reasoning, and thus problem solving, should receive greater attention in legal education discourse (James, 2011, p. 15, James, 2012, p. 88). The dominant approach for problem-based questions in the discipline of law over the last 40 years is IRAC (issue, rule, application and conclusion). The acronym IRAC is not offensive and potentially instils a positive professional legal identity and is a studentcentred approach to problem solving. This journal article documents an incremental approach to IRAC in law where first year students answer a problem-based law question using a grid format before preparing a barrister's advice.

Details

Metrics

403 File views/ downloads
896 Record Views
Logo image