Journal article
Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
Zootaxa, Vol.4564(1), pp.173-197
2019
Abstract
The taxonomic status and systematic nomenclature of the Australian dingo remain contentious, resulting in decades of inconsistent applications in the scientific literature and in policy. Prompted by a recent publication calling for dingoes to be considered taxonomically as domestic dogs (Jackson et al. 2017, Zootaxa 4317, 201-224), we review the issues of the taxonomy applied to canids, and summarise the main differences between dingoes and other canids. We conclude that (1) the Australian dingo is a geographically isolated (allopatric) species from all other Canis, and is genetically, phenotypically, ecologically, and behaviourally distinct; and (2) the dingo appears largely devoid of many of the signs of domestication, including surviving largely as a wild animal in Australia for millennia. The case of defining dingo taxonomy provides a quintessential example of the disagreements between species concepts (e.g., biological, phylogenetic, ecological, morphological). Applying the biological species concept sensu stricto to the dingo as suggested by Jackson et al. (2017) and consistently across the Canidae would lead to an aggregation of all Canis populations, implying for example that dogs and wolves are the same species. Such an aggregation would have substantial implications for taxonomic clarity, biological research, and wildlife conservation. Any changes to the current nomen of the dingo (currently Canis dingo Meyer, 1793), must therefore offer a strong, evidence-based argument in favour of it being recognised as a subspecies of Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758, or as Canis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758, and a successful application to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature - neither of which can be adequately supported. Although there are many species concepts, the sum of the evidence presented in this paper affirms the classification of the dingo as a distinct taxon, namely Canis dingo.
Details
- Title
- Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
- Authors
- Bradley P Smith (Author)Kylie M Cairns (Author)Justin W Adams (Author)Thomas M Newsome (Author)Melanie Fillios (Author)Eloise C Deaux (Author)William C H Parr (Author)Mike Letnic (Author)Lily M Van Eeden (Author)Robert G Appleby (Author)Corey J A Bradshaw (Author)Peter Savolainen (Author)Euan G Ritchie (Author)Dale G Nimmo (Author)Clare Archer-Lean (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast - School of Creative IndustriesAaron C Greenville (Author)Christopher R Dickman (Author)Lyn Watson (Author)Katherine E Moseby (Author)Tim S Doherty (Author)Arian D Wallach (Author)Damian S Morrant (Author)Mathew S Crowther (Author)
- Publication details
- Zootaxa, Vol.4564(1), pp.173-197
- Publisher
- Magnolia Press
- Date published
- 2019
- DOI
- 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6
- ISSN
- 1175-5326
- Copyright note
- Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
- Organisation Unit
- School of Business and Creative Industries; Indigenous and Transcultural Research Centre; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Creative Industries - Legacy; Sustainability Research Cluster
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99451325702621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
113 File views/ downloads
893 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Zoology
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites