Logo image
System thinking applied to near misses: a review of industry-wide near miss reporting systems
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

System thinking applied to near misses: a review of industry-wide near miss reporting systems

Brian Thoroman, Natassia Goode and Paul M Salmon
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol.19(6), pp.712-737
2018
pdf
PDF - Author Accepted Version754.93 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2018.1484527View
Published Version

Abstract

accident causation incident reporting Near miss reporting systems systems thinking
Learning from near misses is an important component of maintaining safe work systems. Within safety science it is widely accepted that a systems approach is the most appropriate for analysing incidents in sociotechnical systems. The aim of this article is to determine whether industry-level near miss reporting systems are consistent with systems thinking. Twenty systems were identified, from a range of work domains, and were evaluated against systems thinking-based criteria. While none of the reporting systems fulfilled the full set of criteria, all are able to identify actors and contributing factors proximal to events in sociotechnical systems and many capture information on how accidents were prevented. It is concluded that the explanatory power of near miss reporting systems is limited by the systems currently used to gather data. The article closes by outlining a research agenda designed to ensure that near miss reporting systems can fully align with the systems approach.

Details

Metrics

200 File views/ downloads
293 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Ergonomics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image