Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function

Suzanne Broadbent; Robert Buhmann; Yuri Kriel; Sonja Coetzee; Christian M Jones; Michelle Morris; Hattie H Wright

doi:10.1186/s13102-024-00882-w

Back

Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function

Suzanne Broadbent, Robert Buhmann, Yuri Kriel, Sonja Coetzee, Christian M Jones, Michelle Morris and Hattie H Wright

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.16, pp.1-8

2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00882-w

Appears in Cancer Research Cluster Research Collection

Files and links (1)

pdf

Broadbent et al 2024_parkrun protocol_1.13 MBDownload View

Published VersionCC BY V4.0, Open Access

Abstract

cancer

parkrun

walking

acceptability

physical function

wellness

diet

Introduction Due to a variety of barriers, the majority of cancer survivors do not do enough physical activity to meet current recommendations. This study will assess the feasibility of participation in parkrun walk-run events as a novel mode of community rehabilitation exercise. Methods This protocol describes a single-arm intervention study with participants acting as their own controls. The study accepts adults diagnosed with any type of cancer, undergoing treatment or in remission. Participants must be able to walk and have medical clearance to exercise. A sample of 100 participants will be recruited across the Sunshine Coast over two years. Data will be collected over 9-months at 4 time points: Baseline (T1); after 4-weeks of usual daily activities and cancer management prior to parkrun participation(T2); after a 6-month parkrun intervention (T3); at 2-month follow-up (T4). The primary objectives are to assess the acceptability of, and adherence to, parkrun as rehabilitation exercise. Secondary outcomes include wellness, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, mood, physical function, parkrun metrics, dietary intake, and diet and exercise behaviour. Conclusion This study will be the first to examine the long-term effects of parkrun as a cancer rehabilitation modality with regard to physical function, psychosocial outcomes and dietary intake. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000473662 registered 09/05/2023.Approved by UniSC Human Research Ethics Committee (A221828) and the UK parkrun Research Board. Original protocol. Authors SB, RB, HHW, MM, YK.

Details

Title: Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function
Authors: Suzanne Broadbent (Corresponding Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science
Robert Buhmann - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science
Yuri Kriel - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science
Sonja Coetzee - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science
Christian M Jones - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Engage Research Lab
Michelle Morris - Sunshine Coast University Private Hospital (Australia)
Hattie H Wright - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Nutrition & Dietetics
Publication details: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.16, pp.1-8
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Date published: 2024
DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-00882-w
ISSN: 2052-1847
Copyright note: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Data Availability: Datasets to be analysed in the study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Organisation Unit: Healthy Ageing Research Cluster; School of Health - Nutrition & Dietetics; Cancer Research Cluster; Engage Research Lab; School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science; School of Law and Society
Language: English
Record Identifier: 991016298802621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads

113 Record Views