family law child's rights acculturation adversarial system expert evidence social work UniSC Diversity Area - Cultural and Linguistic Diversity UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages
The social scientists and legal professionals who work in family law in Australia should be recognised for working tirelessly in a complex, overworked, and archaic system. A system that underserves their capacity to maintain integrity, expertise, and ethical diligence in the professions they are assigned. In this perspective piece, we acknowledge the innovative work being done within this system to strive to meet the best interests of the children they serve, whilst highlighting the fundamental flaws of an adversarial system that breeds acculturation across disciplines and disables the practitioners who operate within these systems from legitimately performing their duties and championing the human rights of children.
Details
Title
“Stay in Your Own Lane” the Inherent Flaws Undermining Children’s Rights Within Australia’s Family Law System: A Perspective from the Field
Authors
Laura Dodds (Corresponding Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Law and Society
Catherine Creamer (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Law and Society
Zalia Powell (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Law and Society
Cindy Davis (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Law and Society
Publication details
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, Vol.8, pp.370-375
Publisher
Springer
Date published
2023
DOI
10.1007/s41134-023-00272-1
ISSN
2365-1792
Copyright note
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Organisation Unit
Cancer Research Cluster; School of Law and Society