Logo image
Statutory Licences and Third Party Dealings: Property Analysis v Statutory Interpretation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Statutory Licences and Third Party Dealings: Property Analysis v Statutory Interpretation

Sharon Christensen, Pamela A O'Connor, W D Duncan and Anna Lark
New Zealand Law Review, (4), pp.585-615
2015
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version121.22 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
http://www.legalresearch.org.nz/new-zealand-law-review.aspxView
Webpage

Abstract

Law
Statutory licensing schemes are proliferating as a means of regulating commercial activity, resource exploitation and activities harmful to the environment. Statutes often declare that entitlements are non-transferable or are transferable only with approval or subject to conditions. Some entitlements, such as resource consents issued under the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ), are declared not to be property. Despite these statutory declarations, entitlements are often held to be transferable in equity or to be property for the purposes of resolving private disputes. Recently, in Greenshell New Zealand Ltd v Tikapa Moana Enterprises Ltd, the High Court of New Zealand indicated that a resource consent was property that could support a claim for relief against forfeiture, continuing the trend in earlier cases that appear to depart from the statute. In this article we examine the juridical treatment of entitlements in private law. We identify factors influencing the courts' enforcement of private arrangements which may circumvent the statutory intent. Our analysis will guide legislators in the design of provisions to implement new schemes.

Details

Metrics

27 File views/ downloads
416 Record Views
Logo image