Logo image
State of science: evolving perspectives on 'human error'
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

State of science: evolving perspectives on 'human error'

Gemma J. M Read, Steven Shorrock, Guy H Walker and Paul M Salmon
Ergonomics, Vol.64(9), pp.1091-1114
2021
PMID: 34243698
pdf
State of science evolving perspectives on human error 1.56 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
pdf
State of science - evolving perspectives on 'human error'567.32 kBDownloadView
Accepted Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

accident analysis complex systems future of ergonomics Human error systems thinking
This paper reviews the key perspectives on human error and analyses the core theories and methods developed and applied over the last 60 years. These theories and methods have sought to improve our understanding of what human error is, and how and why it occurs, to facilitate the prediction of errors and use these insights to support safer work and societal systems. Yet, while this area of Ergonomics and Human Factors (EHF) has been influential and long-standing, the benefits of the 'human error approach' to understanding accidents and optimising system performance have been questioned. This state of science review analyses the construct of human error within EHF. It then discusses the key conceptual difficulties the construct faces in an era of systems EHF. Finally, a way forward is proposed to prompt further discussion within the EHF community.

Details

Metrics

91 File views/ downloads
346 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Engineering, Industrial
Ergonomics
Psychology
Psychology, Applied

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image