Logo image
Snatch Trajectory of Elite level Girevoy (Kettlebell) Sport Athletes and its Implications to Strength and Conditioning Coaching
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Snatch Trajectory of Elite level Girevoy (Kettlebell) Sport Athletes and its Implications to Strength and Conditioning Coaching

James Ross, Cameron Wilson, Justin W L Keogh, Kuok Wai Ho and Christian Lorenzen
International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, Vol.10(2-3), pp.439-452
2015
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version206.14 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.10.2-3.439View
Published Version

Abstract

kettleball snatch kinematics local muscular endurance motion analysis
Girevoy sport (GS) has developed only recently in the West, resulting in a paucity of English scientific literature available. The aim was to document kettlebell trajectory of GS athletes performing the kettlebell snatch. Four elite GS athletes (age = 29-47 years, body mass = 68.3-108.1 kg, height 1.72-1.89 m) completed one set of 16 repetitions with a 32.1 kg kettlebell. Trajectory was captured with the VICON motion analysis system (250 Hz) and analysed with VICON Nexus (1.7.1). The kettlebell followed a 'C' shape trajectory in the sagittal plane. Mean peak velocity in the upwards phase was 4.03±0.20 m s -1, compared to 3.70±0.30 m s-1 during the downwards phase, and mean radial error across the sagittal and frontal planes was 0.022±0.006 m. Low error in the movement suggests consistent trajectory is important to reduce extraneous movement and improve efficiency. While the kettlebell snatch and swing both require large anterior-posterior motion, the snatch requires the kettlebell to be held stationary overhead. Therefore, a different coaching application is required to that of a barbell snatch.

Details

Metrics

79 File views/ downloads
708 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism
Psychology, Applied
Logo image