Root architecture, root biomass and nutrient cycling in a mixed‐species agroforestry system

Shahla Hosseini Bai; Bushra Muqaddas; Stephen J. Trueman; Rachele Wilson; Alexander Keller; Alison Shapcott; Godfrey Hannet; Michael B. Farrar; Birte Komolong; Helen M. Wallace

doi:10.1002/ldr.4832

Back

Root architecture, root biomass and nutrient cycling in a mixed‐species agroforestry system

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Root architecture, root biomass and nutrient cycling in a mixed‐species agroforestry system

Shahla Hosseini Bai, Bushra Muqaddas, Stephen J. Trueman, Rachele Wilson, Alexander Keller, Alison Shapcott, Godfrey Hannet, Michael B. Farrar, Birte Komolong and Helen M. Wallace

Land Degradation & Development, Vol.34(16), pp.5096-5108

2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4832

Files and links (2)

pdf

Root architecture, root biomass and nutrient cycling in a mixed-species agroforestry system1.65 MBDownload View

Published VersionCC BY-NC-ND V4.0, Open Access

url

https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4832View

Published Version

Abstract

agroforestry

canarium

cocoa

coffee

root DNA metabarcoding

Understanding root development in soil profiles of agroforestry systems is challenging. It is uncertain to what extent the proximity of cash crops, such as cocoa and coffee, to shade trees reduces nutrient concentrations in the topsoil and whether the cash crops continue to develop fine roots in the topsoil when they are planted in close proximity to shade trees. We aimed to investigate micro- and macro-nutrient concentrations in the soil profile and understand root architecture using a novel DNA metabarcoding approach in an agroforestry system where cocoa and coffee were interplanted with a shade tree, canarium. Soil and root samples were collected from (1) cocoa-only, (2) cocoa-canarium, (3) canarium-only positions in a cocoa plantation, (4) coffee-only, (5) coffee-canarium and (6) canarium-only positions in a coffee plantation. Proximity of shade trees did not limit nutrient concentrations for cash crops. Topsoil concentrations of total N (TN: 0.59% and 0.69%), phosphorus (P: 7.28 and 6.65 mg/kg), potassium (K: 360 and 755 mg/kg) and calcium (Ca: 1865 and 1044 mg/kg) under cocoa and coffee trees, respectively, did not differ significantly from those under the corresponding canarium trees. Soil TN, K and Ca concentrations were well above minimum required concentrations under both cocoa and coffee. DNA metabarcoding showed that canarium trees occupied deeper rooting zones (30–80 cm soil depth) than cocoa and coffee trees (0–30 cm soil depth). DNA metabarcoding demonstrated greater root colonisation of the topsoil by cocoa and coffee than canarium, suggesting that canarium had the potential to extract nutrients from deeper soil layers. Soil Ca concentrations were associated with cocoa root biomass whereas soil NO3−-N concentrations were associated with coffee root biomass. Our study highlighted the value of selecting suitable shade trees that maintain soil nutrient concentrations for cash crops. Furthermore, DNA metabarcoding can facilitate root distribution studies in complex agroforestry systems, thus providing insights into appropriate tree-planting designs.

Details

Title: Root architecture, root biomass and nutrient cycling in a mixed‐species agroforestry system
Authors: Shahla Hosseini Bai (Corresponding Author) - Griffith University
Bushra Muqaddas (Author) - Griffith University
Stephen J. Trueman (Author) - Griffith University
Rachele Wilson (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Bioinnovation
Alexander Keller (Author) - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alison Shapcott (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Centre for Bioinnovation
Godfrey Hannet (Author) - National Agricultural Research Institute
Michael B. Farrar (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Science, Technology and Engineering
Birte Komolong (Author) - National Agricultural Research Institute
Helen M. Wallace (Author) - Griffith University
Publication details: Land Degradation & Development, Vol.34(16), pp.5096-5108
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Date published: 2023
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4832
ISSN: 1099-145X; 1085-3278
Copyright note: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsLicense, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Grant note: FST/2014/099, FST/2017/038 / Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Organisation Unit: School of Science and Engineering - Legacy; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; GeneCology Research Centre - Legacy; School of Science, Technology and Engineering; Centre for Bioinnovation
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99744998402621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads

56 Record Views

4 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration; International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Environmental Sciences; Soil Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites