Published Version (Advanced Access)CC BY V4.0, Open Access
Abstract
Sports medicine Dynamometry force platforms grip strength handheld isometric mid-thigh pull measurement properties validity
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the intrarater within-day and between-day absolute agreement reliability of DynaMo Max and DynaMo Plus handheld dynamometers for upper and lower body isometric strength assessments compared to existing devices.
Design
Repeated measures study.
Setting
Two laboratory sessions, seven days apart.
Participants
Twenty healthy, recreationally active adults (40% female; age = 29.1 ± 5.8 years).
Main Outcome Measures
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement for fourteen isometric strength tests.
Results
DynaMo Max exhibited excellent between-day and within-day reliability (ICC >0.90) for 21 of 24 (88%) upper and lower body isometric strength tests. Tests using tension were more reliable than those using compression. DynaMo Plus demonstrated similar reliability to the Jamar Hydraulic device for grip strength, although limits of agreement were -7.4 to 7.7 kg. DynaMo Max measured peak IMTP force with high levels of agreement to the ForceDecks (R2=0.99, -22 to 95 N).
Conclusions
DynaMo Plus and Max are reliable tools for isometric strength assessments of upper and lower body muscle groups. Tension tests are recommended over manually resisted compression tests. DynaMo Max and Plus are accurate and reliable options for IMTP and grip strength testing, respectively.
Details
Title
Reliability of VALD DynaMo dynamometer to assess upper and lower body isometric strength in healthy adults
Authors
Tyler Collings (Corresponding Author) - Griffith University
Benjamin I Goodlich (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Physiotherapy
Andrea H Hams - Griffith University
Matthew N Bourne - Griffith University
Publication details
Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol.75, pp.135-143
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Date published
2025
DOI
10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.08.005
ISSN
1873-1600; 1466-853X
Grant note
This research was funded by VALD who provided equipment and data collection costs.