Logo image
Reflections about Garfield’s algorithm
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Reflections about Garfield’s algorithm

Laura Sinay, Maria C F De Sinay, R W (Bill) Carter and Aurea Martins
RAUSP Management Journal, Vol.54(4), pp.548-558
2019
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access) - English version307.68 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access) - English versionCC BY V4.0 Open Access
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access) - Portuguese version296.40 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access) - Portuguese versionCC BY V4.0 Open Access
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access) - Spanish version292.38 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access) - Spanish versionCC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0079View
Published Version

Abstract

science Garfield's algorithm logic behind the algorithm of science reflection and critical study
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the influence of the algorithm used on scholarly search engines (Garfield's algorithm) and propose metrics to improve it so that science could be based on a more democratic way. Design/methodology/approach - This paper used a snow-ball approach to collect data that allowed identifying the history and the logic behind the Garfield's algorithm. It follows on excerpting the foundation of existing algorithm and databases of major scholarly search engine. It concluded proposing new metrics so as to surpass restraints and to democratize the scientific discourse. Findings - This paper finds that the studied algorithm currently biases the scientific discourse toward a narrow perspective, while it should take into consideration several researchers' characteristics. It proposes the substitution of the h-index by the number of times the scholar's most cited work has been cited. Finally, it proposes that works in languages different than English should be included. Research limitations/implications - The broad comprehension of any phenomena should be based on multiple perspectives; therefore, the inclusion of diverse metrics will extend the scientific discourse. Practical implications - The improvement of the existing algorithm will increase the chances of contact among different cultures, which stimulate rapid progress on the development of knowledge. Originality/value - The value of this paper residesin demonstrating that the algorithm usedin scholarly search engines biases the development of science. If updated as proposed here, science will be unbiased and bias aware.

Details

Metrics

46 File views/ downloads
193 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Business
Management
Logo image