Logo image
Back
Reducing welfare fraud: an Australian case study
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Reducing welfare fraud: an Australian case study

Timothy Prenzler
Security Journal, Vol.30(2), pp.569-584
2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.36
url
https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.36View
Published Version

Abstract

Criminology Crime prevention welfare fraud fraud prevention early intervention
This article evaluates the factors behind changes in welfare fraud referrals and convictions in Australia from 2009-2010 to 2012-2013. Official numbers of cases referred to the public prosecutor and those proven fell by approximately 75 per cent across the 3-year period. As a rate per customer, referrals fell 82 per cent. The evidence indicates that initially this was less a case of successful planned crime prevention than an effect of changes in institutional policy and practice. It appears that a major shift in enforcement practices was adopted by Centrelink and the public prosecutor, in part as a result of a legal case reducing customer liability for non-reporting of changes in their circumstances. Centrelink also adopted a new two-pronged strategy: focusing investigations and prosecutions on more serious cases, while also initiating an 'early contact' system to communicate more effectively with customers about their reporting obligations to prevent error and debt. The article reports on a number of other aspects of welfare fraud in Australia, including gender and sentencing.

Details

Metrics

12 File views/ downloads
1665 Record Views
5 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Criminology & Penology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Source: InCites

Logo image