Introduction: Governments worldwide are committed to reducing the prevalence of peer-to-peer online trolling. The practice of peer-to-peer online trolling, which is broadly defined as where a user intends to cause disruption or conflict online for their own amusement or advantage, is a widespread pervasive and damaging behavior, affecting over one-third of all social media users. There remains, however, a substantial barrier to addressing this behaviour due to a lack of understanding of peer-to-peer online trolling and its unique psychopathology that distinguishes it from other forms of peer-to-peer online abuse such as cyberbullying and flaming, as well as the primary information technology approach used to investigate trolling. Providing a synthesis of peer-to-peer online trolling research will assist organisations, governments and educators in addressing this deviant behaviour online.
Methods and analysis: This protocol follows the six-stage scoping review process proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. Identifying the scoping review research question (stage 1) is followed by discussion on how studies will be selected (stage 2). We then discuss how we will determine which studies will be included in the scoping review (stage 3), as well as chart the data involved for each study included (stage 4). In stage 5, the scoping review protocol gathers, synthesises and reports the results, and consults with stakeholders about the initial protocol specifications (stage 6).
Ethics and dissemination: As the scoping review methodology focuses on incorporating information from available publications, ethical approval is not required. An article summarising the scoping review results will be submitted for publication to a journal, presented at appropriate conferences and disseminated as part of future workshops with professionals and educators involved in reducing online trolling.
Details
Title
Reducing the incidence and impact of peer-to-peer online trolling: a protocol for a scoping review
Authors
Amanda Tracy Beatson (Corresponding Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Aimee Riedel (Author) - Griffith University
Rory Mulcahy (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Business and Creative Industries
Byron William Keating (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Shasha Wang (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Marilyn Campbell (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Daniel Johnson (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Publication details
BMJ Open, Vol.13(3), pp.1-4
Publisher
BMJ Group
Date published
2023
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070460
ISSN
2044-6055
PMID
36918237
Copyright note
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Organisation Unit
School of Business and Creative Industries
Language
English
Record Identifier
99713693302621
Output Type
Journal article
Metrics
46 File views/ downloads
23 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Business
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals: