Logo image
Quantitative measurement of mammographic density in breast-tissue explants using portable NMR: Precision and accuracy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Quantitative measurement of mammographic density in breast-tissue explants using portable NMR: Precision and accuracy

Satcha Foongkajornkiat, Kamil Sokolowski, James Stephenson, Thomas Lloyd, Honor J. Hugo, Erik W. Thompson and Konstantin I. Momot
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol.92(1), pp.374-388
2024
PMID: 38380719
pdf
Magnetic Resonance in Med - 2024 - Foongkajornkiat - Quantitative measurement of mammographic density in breast‐tissue3.67 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

breast density composition of breast tissue compositional imaging mammographic density nuclear magnetic resonance single-sided portable NMR
Purpose Single-sided portable NMR (pNMR) has previously been demonstrated to be suitable for quantification of mammographic density (MD) in excised breast tissue samples. Here we investigate the precision and accuracy of pNMR measurements of MD ex vivo as compared with the gold standards. Methods Forty-five breast-tissue explants from 9 prophylactic mastectomy patients were measured. The relative tissue water content was taken as the MD-equivalent quantity. In each sample, the water content was measured using some combination of three pNMR techniques (apparent T2, diffusion, and T1 measurements) and two gold-standard techniques (computed microtomography [μCT] and hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] histology). Pairwise correlation plots and Bland–Altman analysis were used to quantify the degree of agreement between pNMR techniques and the gold standards. Results Relative water content measured from both apparent T2 relaxation spectra, and diffusion decays exhibited strong correlation with the H&E and μCT results. Bland–Altman analysis yielded average bias values of −0.4, −2.6, 2.6, and 2.8 water percentage points (pp) and 95% confidence intervals of 13.1, 7.5, 11.2, and 11.8 pp for the H&E – T2, μCT – T2, H&E – diffusion, and μCT – diffusion comparison pairs, respectively. T1-based measurements were found to be less reliable, with the Bland–Altman confidence intervals of 27.7 and 33.0 pp when compared with H&E and μCT, respectively. Conclusion Apparent T2-based and diffusion-based pNMR measurements enable quantification of MD in breast-tissue explants with the precision of approximately 10 pp and accuracy of approximately 3 pp or better, making pNMR a promising measurement modality for radiation-free quantification of MD.

Details

Metrics

10 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image