Logo image
Quality of life in caregivers of patients randomized to standard versus extended hour hemodialysis
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Quality of life in caregivers of patients randomized to standard versus extended hour hemodialysis

Melissa Nataatmadja, Rathika Krishnasamy, Li Zuo, Daqing Hong, Brendan Smyth, Min Jun, Janak R de Zoysa, Kirsten Howard, Jing Wang, Chunlai Lu, …
Kidney International Reports, Vol.6(4), pp.1058-1065
2021
PMCID: PMC8071646
PMID: 33912756
pdf
Quality of Life in Caregivers of Patients Randomized to Standard- Versus Extended-Hours Hemodialysis774.13 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

quality of life hemodialysis caregiver extended dialysis Co-ACTIVE A Clinical Trial of Intensive Dialysis UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages
Introduction: Caregivers are essential for the health, safety and independence of many patients and incur financial and personal cost in this role, including increased burden and lower quality of life (QOL) compared to the general population. Extended hours hemodialysis may be the preference of some patients, but little is known about its effects on caregivers. Methods: Forty caregivers of participants of the ACTIVE Dialysis trial, who were randomized to 12 months extended (median 24 hours/week) or standard (12 hours/week) hemodialysis, were included. Utility-based QOL measured by EuroQOL-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Short Form-6D (SF-6D); and health related QOL (HRQOL) measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), and Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) were measured at enrolment then every 3 months until end of study. Results: At baseline, utility-based QOL and HRQOL were similar in both groups. At follow-up, caregivers of people randomized to extended hours dialysis experienced a greater decrease in utility-based QOL measured by EQ-5D-3L compared to caregivers of people randomized to standard hours (-0.18±0.30 vs -0.02±0.16, p=0.04). There were no differences between extended and standard hours groups in mean change in SF-6D (0.03±0.12 vs -0.04±0.1, p=0.8), PCS (-1.2±9.8 vs -5.6±9.8, p=0.2), MCS (-4.1±11.2 vs -0.5±7.1, p=0.4), and PWI (2.3±17.6 vs 0.00±20.4, p=0.9). Conclusion: Poorer utility-based QOL, as measured by the EQ-5D-3L, was observed in caregivers of patients receiving extended hours hemodialysis in this small study. Though the findings are exploratory, the possibility that mode of dialysis delivery negatively impacts on caregivers supports the prioritization of research on burden and impact of service delivery in this population.

Details

Metrics

7 File views/ downloads
55 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Urology & Nephrology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image