Logo image
Quality assurance of assessment and moderation discourses involving sessional staff
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Quality assurance of assessment and moderation discourses involving sessional staff

Peter R Grainger, Lenore Adie and Katie Weir
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.41(4), pp.548-559
2016
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1030333View
Published Version

Abstract

assessment moderation consensus university sessional staff
Quality assurance is a major agenda in tertiary education. The casualisation of academic work, especially in teaching, is also a quality assurance issue. Casual or sessional staff members teach and assess more than 50% of all university courses in Australia, and yet the research in relation to the role sessional staff play in quality assurance of student assessment outcomes is scarce. Moderation processes are a pivotal part of robust quality assurance measures. Drawing upon previous work surrounding four discourses of moderation, this pilot project reports the results of research into the role and impact of sessional staff in moderation processes at tertiary level. Qualitative data were gathered through focus interviews. Results, in the form of various moderation discourses, indicate that sessional staff impact the formal quality assurance processes in numerous ways.

Details

Metrics

10 File views/ downloads
1728 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Logo image