Prognostic and predictive values of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with primary definitive (chemo)radiation and impact of HPV status: Review of current literature and emerging roles

Peter Lin; Lois Holloway; Myo Min; Mark Lee; Allan Fowler

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109686

Back

Prognostic and predictive values of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with primary definitive (chemo)radiation and impact of HPV status: Review of current literature and emerging roles

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Prognostic and predictive values of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with primary definitive (chemo)radiation and impact of HPV status: Review of current literature and emerging roles

Peter Lin, Lois Holloway, Myo Min, Mark Lee and Allan Fowler

Radiotherapy & Oncology, Vol.184, pp.1-14

2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109686

PMID: 37142128

Files and links (2)

pdf

Prognostic and predictive values of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with primary definitive (chemo)radiation and impact of HPV status Review of current literature and emerging roles594.86 kBDownload View

Published VersionCC BY-NC-ND V4.0, Open Access

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109686View

Published Version

Abstract

Systematic review

Human papillomavirus

Radiotherapy

Oropharyngeal cancer

FDG PET

Prognostic

Background and purpose: This study provides a review of the literature assessing whether semiquantitative PET parameters acquired at baseline and/or during definitive (chemo)radiotherapy ("prePET" and "iPET") can predict survival outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC), and the impact of human papilloma virus (HPV) status. Material and methods: A literature search was carried out using PubMed and Embase between 2001 to 2021 in accordance with PRISMA. Results: The analysis included 22 FDG-PET/CT studies [1-22], 19 pre-PET and 3 both pre-PET and iPET, The analysis involved 2646 patients, of which 1483 are HPV-positive (17 studies: 10 mixed and 7 HPV-positive only), 589 are HPV-negative, and 574 have unknown HPV status. Eighteen studies found significant correlations of survival outcomes with pre-PET parameters, most commonly primary or "Total" (combined primary and nodal) metabolic tumour volume and/or total lesional glycolysis. Two studies could not establish significant correlations and both employed SUVmax only. Two studies also could not establish significant correlations when taking into account of the HPV-positive population only. Because of the heterogeneity and lack of standardized methodology, no conclusions on optimal cut-off values can be drawn. Ten studies specifically evaluated HPV-positive patients: five showed positive correlation of pre-PET parameters and survival outcomes, but four of these studies did not include advanced T or N staging in multivariate analysis, and two studies only showed positive correlations after excluding high risk patients with smoking history or adverse CT features. Two studies found that prePET parameters predicted treatment outcomes only in HPV-negative but not HPV-positive patients. Two studies found that iPET parameters could predict outcomes in HPV-positive patients but not prePET parameters. Conclusion: The current literature supports high pre-treatment metabolic burden prior to definitive (chemo)radiotherapy can predict poor treatment outcomes for HPV-negative OPC patients. Evidence is conflicting and currently does not support correlation in HPV-positive patients.

Details

Title: Prognostic and predictive values of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with primary definitive (chemo)radiation and impact of HPV status: Review of current literature and emerging roles
Authors: Peter Lin (Corresponding Author) - UNSW Australia
Lois Holloway (Author) - UNSW Australia
Myo Min (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering
Mark Lee (Author) - UNSW Australia
Allan Fowler (Author) - Liverpool Hospital
Publication details: Radiotherapy & Oncology, Vol.184, pp.1-14
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Date published: 2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109686
ISSN: 1879-0887; 0167-8140
PMID: 37142128
Copyright note: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Organisation Unit: University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; Thompson Institute
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99735294602621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

21 File views/ downloads

35 Record Views

4 Times Cited - Web of Science

See more details

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration; International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Oncology; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites